Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FLKR vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FLKR and ONEQ

Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
FLKR total return, 1 year
+12.7%
ONEQ total return, 1 year
0.09%
FLKR expense ratio
0.21%
ONEQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FLKR costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 67.0 points.

FLKR vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRONEQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+12.7%
Drawdown
Below its high24.1%, high on Jun 22, 20263.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE South Korea RIC Capped IndexNasdaq Composite Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.21%
Net assets, FLKR as of Oct 28, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026$1.9bn$10.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%56.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FLKR ONEQ
SK HYNIX INC 27.39% 0.06%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FLKR
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 18.00%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 4.30%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 4.17%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.46%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 2.01%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.99%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY LTD 1.50%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO LTD 1.43%
Only in ONEQ
NVIDIA CORP 11.57%
APPLE INC 10.08%
MICROSOFT CORP 8.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.05%
ALPHABET INC 4.28%
ALPHABET INC 3.96%
BROADCOM INC 3.80%
TESLA INC 2.99%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the FTSE South Korea Tracks the Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +12.7%
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.21%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 84.6%
Holdings 156 1026
Net assets, FLKR as of Oct 28, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.9bn $10.9bn

FLKR and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FLKR

FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

ONEQ

ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or ONEQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and ONEQ +12.7%.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or ONEQ?
FLKR is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLKR and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FLKR and 85% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLKR against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-oneq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.