Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FLKR vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to MOAT's +10.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FLKR and MOAT

Net assets: $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
FLKR total return, 1 year
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
0.09%
FLKR expense ratio
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FLKR costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 69.4 points; MOAT is 6.6 times larger.

FLKR vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRMOAT
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+10.3%
Drawdown
Below its high24.1%, high on Jun 22, 20263.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE South Korea RIC Capped IndexMorningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.46%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$1.8bn$11.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 466 weekly returns
FLKR MOAT
Return
Total return edge MOAT +144.1% +209.2%
Annualized edge MOAT +10.5% +13.4%
Price return edge MOAT +92.4% +175.6%
Risk
Volatility edge MOAT 29.4% 19.4%
Max drawdown edge MOAT −50.1% −30.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MOAT 0.39 0.61
Sortino edge MOAT 0.58 0.88
Calmar edge MOAT 0.21 0.44
Reading

MOAT returned more: +209.2% to +144.1%. MOAT swung less: 19.4% to 29.4%. MOAT fell less at its worst: −30.8% to −50.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FLKR vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRMOATEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+144.1%+209.2%MOATPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.5%+13.4%MOATTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+92.4%+175.6%MOATPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility29.4%19.4%MOATSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation20.0%13.4%MOATLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.1%−30.8%MOATDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.390.61MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.580.88MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.210.44MOATAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 466 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FLKR MOAT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FLKR
SK HYNIX INC 27.39%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 18.00%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 4.30%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 4.17%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.46%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 2.01%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.99%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY LTD 1.50%
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Microsoft Corp 2.81%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the FTSE South Korea Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +10.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −3.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.46%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 91.6%
Holdings 156 54
Net assets, FLKR as of Oct 28, 2026 and MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.9bn $11.6bn

FLKR and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MOAT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FLKR

FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or MOAT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and MOAT +10.3%.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or MOAT?
FLKR is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLKR and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FLKR and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLKR against MOAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-moat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.