Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FLKR vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FLKR returned +79.7% to ILF's +17.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FLKR and ILF

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $1.9bn for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF and $3.5bn for iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
FLKR total return, 1 year
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
0.09%
FLKR expense ratio
0.47%
ILF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FLKR costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 62.5 points; ILF is 1.8 times larger.

FLKR vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRILF
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+17.2%
Drawdown
Below its high24.1%, high on Jun 22, 202613.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE South Korea RIC Capped IndexS&P Latin America 40
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.47%
Net assets$1.9bn$3.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%55.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 466 weekly returns
FLKR ILF
Return
Total return edge FLKR +144.1% +78.6%
Annualized edge FLKR +10.5% +6.7%
Price return edge FLKR +92.4% +11.8%
Risk
Volatility edge ILF (slight) 29.4% 27.2%
Max drawdown edge FLKR (slight) −50.1% −54.5%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FLKR 0.39 0.28
Sortino edge FLKR 0.58 0.40
Calmar edge FLKR 0.21 0.12
Reading

FLKR returned more: +144.1% to +78.6%. ILF swung slightly less: 27.2% to 29.4%. FLKR fell slightly less at its worst: −50.1% to −54.5%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FLKR vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFLKRILFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+144.1%+78.6%FLKRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.5%+6.7%FLKRTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+92.4%+11.8%FLKRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility29.4%27.2%ILF (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation20.0%19.0%ILF (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.1%−54.5%FLKR (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.390.28FLKRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.580.40FLKRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.210.12FLKRAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 466 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FLKR ILF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FLKR
SK HYNIX INC 27.39%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 18.00%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 4.30%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 4.17%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.46%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 2.01%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.99%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY LTD 1.50%
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the FTSE South Korea Tracks an index of Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +17.2%
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.47%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 156 46
Net assets $1.9bn $3.5bn

FLKR and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

ILF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FLKR

FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or ILF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +79.7% and ILF +17.2%.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or ILF?
FLKR is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. That is about $38 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLKR and ILF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FLKR and 0% of ILF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLKR against ILF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flkr-vs-ilf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.