Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FHEQ vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FHEQ returned +8.7% to TLT's −4.8%, and TLT charges 0.15% to FHEQ's 0.48%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FHEQ and TLT
Net assets: $986m on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF, and $48.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.5 points.
| Measure | FHEQ | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% | −4.8% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +8.4% | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 41.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not published | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 4.7 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.48% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, FHEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 and TLT as of Nov 3, 2026 | $986m | $48.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.98 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.82: about 0.82% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.92% | |
| Down-week capture | 86.0% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Risk and return
Apr 19, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 132 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: FHEQ against VOO, Apr 19, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026; TLT against BBLB, Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Apr 2024 to Oct 2026, FHEQ returned more: +38.9% to +2.3%. FHEQ swung less: 10.8% to 12.1%. FHEQ fell less at its worst: −10.5% to −15.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FHEQ | TLT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +38.9% | +2.3% | FHEQ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.8% | +0.9% | FHEQ | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +36.6% | −8.2% | FHEQ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 10.8% | 12.1% | FHEQ | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 6.7% | 8.7% | FHEQ | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −10.5% | −15.4% | FHEQ | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 70.4% | 102.4% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 86.3% | 101.2% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.71 | 1.01 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.91 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.86 | −0.22 | FHEQ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.38 | −0.30 | FHEQ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.130 | −0.070 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 1.32 | 0.06 | FHEQ | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | VOO | BBLB | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −1.2% a year | 0.0% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.57 | 0.01 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −5.3% to +2.9% | −0.8% to +0.8% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −1.02 | −0.09 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 5.3% | 0.7% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 132 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
FHEQ and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FHEQ
FHEQ is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.98 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.82, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.82% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FHEQ fell 0.92% on average, a down-week capture of 86.0%. Over the same 52 weeks FHEQ returned +8.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 4.7 percentage points ahead of cash.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against −4.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 41.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are FHEQ and TLT in the same category?
- FHEQ is an alternatives ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, FHEQ or TLT?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FHEQ returned +8.7% and TLT −4.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FHEQ or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FHEQ against TLT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fheq-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FHEQ against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fheq-vs-tlt
[FHEQ against TLT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fheq-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.