Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FENI vs IDEV: how they differ
FENI and IDEV hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and FENI returned more over the year.
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FENI and IDEV hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FENI | IDEV |
|---|---|---|
| DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD | 0.22% | 0.42% |
| RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP | 0.30% | 0.13% |
| UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LTD | 0.31% | 0.13% |
| DISCO CORP | 0.21% | 0.10% |
| BOC HONG KONG HOLDINGS LTD | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| SUN HUNG KAI PROPERTIES LTD | 0.16% | 0.07% |
| BANDAI NAMCO HOLDINGS INC | 0.36% | 0.06% |
| DAIWA SECURITIES GROUP INC | 0.47% | 0.05% |
| CK ASSET HOLDINGS LTD | 0.12% | 0.04% |
| GEA GROUP AG | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| SYMRISE AG | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| MINEBEA MITSUMI INC | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Only in FENI | Only in IDEV |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING NV 4.11% | ASML HOLDING 2.29% |
| NESTLE SA 1.77% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.22% |
| SIEMENS AG 1.63% | ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.02% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46% | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.98% |
| ABB LTD 1.34% | SHELL PLC 0.91% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.33% | MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.88% |
| IBERDROLA SA 1.23% | NOVARTIS AG 0.87% |
| BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22% | NESTLE SA 0.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| FENI Fidelity Enhanced International ETF | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Enhanced International | Core MSCI International Developed Markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.4% | +18.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.9 pts | +1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Holdings | 392 | 1782 |
FENI in plain words
FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.
IDEV in plain words
IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1782 positions, with the top ten at 10.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FENI or IDEV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and IDEV returned +18.7%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FENI or IDEV?
- FENI charges 0.28% a year and IDEV charges 0.04%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FENI and IDEV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FENI and 0% of IDEV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FENI against IDEV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/feni-vs-idev Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources