Which returned more over the last year, FEBZ or SPYM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FEBZ returned +11.7% and SPYM returned +17.6%, so SPYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FEBZ or SPYM?

FEBZ charges 0.79% a year and SPYM charges 1.30%, so FEBZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are FEBZ and SPYM the same kind of fund?

No. FEBZ is a buffer ETF and SPYM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FEBZ vs SPYM: how they differ

Over the year SPYM returned more, +17.6% against +11.7%, and FEBZ charges 0.79% against 1.30%.

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF.

FEBZ and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	SPYM State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF
Where it sits	Buffer ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	TrueShares	State Street
What it is	Defined outcome, 10% on SPX	S&P 500
Total return, 1 year	+11.7%	+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	not published	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	not available	+0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.79%	1.30%
Holdings	not filed	507

FEBZ in plain words

This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPX. The fund's price can fall 7.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPX can fall 9.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPX level. 143 days remained on Sep 13, 2026. On Jan 29, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

SPYM in plain words

SPYM is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FEBZ or SPYM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FEBZ returned +11.7% and SPYM returned +17.6%, so SPYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FEBZ or SPYM?: FEBZ charges 0.79% a year and SPYM charges 1.30%, so FEBZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are FEBZ and SPYM the same kind of fund?: No. FEBZ is a buffer ETF and SPYM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FEBZ against SPYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEBZ against SPYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/febz-vs-spym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources