Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs XLG: how they differ
FDVV and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDVV | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 6.86% | NVIDIA Corp 12.79% |
| APPLE INC 5.70% | Apple Inc 11.58% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% | Microsoft Corp 8.83% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.50% | Amazon.com Inc 5.95% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.21% | Broadcom Inc 4.12% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | Alphabet Inc 3.77% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Invesco |
| What it is | High Dividend | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 96 | 52 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and XLG returned +12.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or XLG?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against XLG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources