Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FDVV vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDVV returned +13.5% to REMX's −19.2%, and FDVV charges 0.15% to REMX's 0.53%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDVV and REMX
Net assets: $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF, and $1.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.
Pair scorecard
FDVV costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.7 points.
| Measure | FDVV | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | −19.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fidelity High Dividend Index | Rare earth and critical materials |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.53% |
| Net assets, FDVV as of Sep 30, 2026 and REMX as of Oct 27, 2026 | $10.2bn | $1.5bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 61% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FDVV and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Are FDVV and REMX in the same category?
- FDVV is a stock ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or REMX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +13.5% and REMX −19.2%.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or REMX?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. That is about $38 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDVV against REMX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-remx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FDVV against REMX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-remx
[FDVV against REMX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-remx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.