Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FDN vs FDND: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDN returned −1.1% to FDND's −2.4%, and FDN charges 0.49% to FDND's 0.75%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDN and FDND
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $5.1bn for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund and $9.8m for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF.
Pair scorecard
FDN costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; FDN is far larger, $5.1bn against $9.8m.
| Measure | FDN | FDND |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.1% | −2.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 1.1% | fell 9.9% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 8.0% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 92% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 6.3%, high on Oct 9, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Internet and e-commerce | Benchmark: First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund, measured through FDN |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 14.8 pts | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 14.8 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $5.1bn | $9.8m |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 86% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 100% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 82% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 134 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: FDN against IVV, Jun 30, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; FDND against FDN, Mar 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026.
FDN returned more: +37.1% to +31.6%. FDND swung slightly less: 21.2% to 22.2%. FDND fell slightly less at its worst: −24.0% to −24.8%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FDN | FDND | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +37.1% | +31.6% | FDN | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.0% | +11.2% | FDN | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +37.1% | +7.0% | FDN | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 22.2% | 21.2% | FDND (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.9% | 14.4% | FDND (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.8% | −24.0% | FDND (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 138.3% | 89.4% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 113.1% | 97.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.15 | 0.95 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.71 | 0.99 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.47 | 0.41 | FDN | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.70 | 0.60 | FDN | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.121 | 0.090 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.52 | 0.47 | FDN | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IVV | FDN | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +1.8% a year | −1.3% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.64 | −1.29 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −3.8% to +7.4% | −3.3% to +0.7% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.26 | −0.93 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 13.2% | 1.9% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 134 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and FDND hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
100% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FDN and FDND on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
FDN and FDND do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FDN follows Internet and e-commerce and FDND is measured against First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund through FDN.
- Cost. FDN charges 0.49% of assets a year and FDND 0.75%, a gap of 0.26 points.
- Size. FDN has $5.1bn in net assets and FDND $9.8m (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); FDN is 520.4 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FDN
By weight, 82% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 14.8 pts. It sits 6.3% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2026.
FDND
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.4%. First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) returned −1.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
- Are FDN and FDND in the same category?
- FDN is a thematic ETF and FDND is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, FDN or FDND?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDN returned −1.1% and FDND −2.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or FDND?
- FDN is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDN against FDND, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdn-vs-fdnd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FDN against FDND. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdn-vs-fdnd
[FDN against FDND (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdn-vs-fdnd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.