Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FDL vs SMIG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDL returned +26.0% to SMIG's +12.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FDL and SMIG

Net assets: $8.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Morningstar ETF, and $1.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF.

At a glance
+26.0%
FDL total return, 1 year
+12.2%
SMIG total return, 1 year
0.43%
FDL expense ratio
0.60%
SMIG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FDL costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.8 points.

FDL vs SMIG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFDLSMIG
Return
Total return, 1 year+26.0%+12.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Dividend Leaders IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.43%0.60%
Net assets, FDL as of Oct 27, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026$8.2bn$1.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50.6%42.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FDL and SMIG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FDL SMIG
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. 0.06% 2.31%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FDL
Chevron Corporation 9.28%
Verizon Communications Inc. 6.58%
Pfizer Inc. 6.55%
Philip Morris International Inc. 6.48%
PepsiCo, Inc. 5.00%
Altria Group, Inc. 4.82%
United Parcel Service, Inc. (Class B) 3.24%
Accenture plc 3.20%
Only in SMIG
Silicon Motion Technology Corp 6.66%
Targa Resources Corp 4.89%
Snap-on Inc 4.70%
Victory Capital Holdings Inc 4.30%
DT Midstream Inc 4.19%
Hubbell Inc 4.01%
Gildan Activewear Inc 3.78%
Packaging Corp of America 3.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FDL First Trust Morningstar ETF SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +26.0% +12.2%
Expense ratio 0.43% 0.60%
Already in the S&P 500 93.3% 35.4%
Holdings 100 38
Net assets, FDL as of Oct 27, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026 $8.2bn $1.5bn

FDL and SMIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FDL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FDL

FDL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.43% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 50.6%.

SMIG

SMIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 35% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 42.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDL or SMIG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDL returned +26.0% and SMIG +12.2%.
Which is cheaper, FDL or SMIG?
FDL is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDL and SMIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of FDL and 35% of SMIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FDL against SMIG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdl-vs-smig

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.