Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FBCG vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to VT's +13.5%; 32% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FBCG and VT
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and $81.8bn for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.0 points; VT is 10.8 times larger.
| Measure | FBCG | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.5% | +13.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $7.6bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 32% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.2% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returnsFBCG returned more: +197.7% to +138.9%. VT swung less: 15.2% to 23.9%. VT fell less at its worst: −26.2% to −42.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FBCG | VT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +197.7% | +138.9% | FBCG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +18.6% | +14.6% | FBCG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +197.2% | +110.5% | FBCG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 23.9% | 15.2% | VT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.5% | 10.0% | VT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −42.6% | −26.2% | VT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.71 | 0.77 | VT (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.09 | 1.17 | VT (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.44 | 0.56 | VT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VT hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
32% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FBCG and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and VT +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.0 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FBCG against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FBCG against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-vt
[FBCG against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.