Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FBCG vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FBCG and SHV
Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $21.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
SHV costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.9 points; SHV is 3.0 times larger.
| Measure | FBCG | SHV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.5% | +3.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $7.6bn | $22.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FBCG and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SHV
SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SHV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SHV +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or SHV?
- SHV is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FBCG against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-shv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FBCG against SHV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-shv
[FBCG against SHV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-shv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.