Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs GARP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to GARP's +18.0%; 42% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and GARP

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $3.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+18.0%
GARP total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.15%
GARP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GARP costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; FBCG is 2.2 times larger.

FBCG vs GARP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGGARP
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+18.0%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20267.0%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.15%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$3.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common42%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%43.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG GARP
Return
Total return edge GARP +197.7% +235.4%
Annualized edge GARP +18.6% +20.9%
Price return edge GARP +197.2% +219.2%
Risk
Volatility edge GARP 23.9% 20.6%
Max drawdown edge GARP −42.6% −29.8%
Downside capture 126.3% 109.0%
Beta 1.39 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GARP 0.71 0.87
Sortino edge GARP 1.09 1.37
Treynor 0.121 0.157
Calmar edge GARP 0.44 0.70
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year +3.4% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 1.15
Information ratio 0.26 0.59
Tracking error 11.2% 7.9%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; GARP against PBUS, Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GARP returned more: +235.4% to +197.7%. GARP swung less: 20.6% to 23.9%. GARP fell less at its worst: −29.8% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs GARP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGGARPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+235.4%GARPPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+20.9%GARPTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+219.2%GARPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%20.6%GARPSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%13.1%GARPLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−29.8%GARPDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%133.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%109.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.850.88Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.87GARPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.37GARPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.157Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.70GARPAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOPBUSThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year+3.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.701.15Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−2.4% to +9.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.59Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%7.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

42%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and GARP hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

42% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG GARP
APPLE INC 9.31% 5.66%
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 5.18%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 5.67%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 4.72%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 2.24%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86% 2.12%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 4.61%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 1.70%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.59% 1.73%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 2.01%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85% 0.86%
APPLOVIN CORP 1.16% 0.73%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TESLA INC 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
BOEING CO 0.58%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC 0.57%
Only in GARP
ADOBE INC 2.17%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.07%
MERCADOLIBRE 1.86%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP 1.83%
ELI LILLY 1.78%
FORTINET 1.77%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 1.27%
AUTODESK 1.12%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +18.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.3% (PBUS)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO +4.7 pts vs PBUS
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 94.4%
Holdings 230 131
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and GARP as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $3.6bn

FBCG and GARP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F8388CCD69

FBCG and GARP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and GARP follows MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 42% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and GARP +18.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GARP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

GARP

GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.5%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or GARP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and GARP +18.0%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or GARP?
GARP is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and GARP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 94% of GARP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against GARP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-garp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.