Which returned more over the last year, EWY or VTEB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +147.9% and VTEB returned +0.2%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWY or VTEB?

EWY charges 0.59% a year and VTEB charges 0.03%, so VTEB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWY vs VTEB: how they differ

EWY and VTEB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWY returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and VTEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWY	Only in VTEB
SK HYNIX 24.02%	University of California 0.12%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 22.13%	Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority 0.12%
SK SQUARE 3.01%	Colorado State Education Loan Program 0.11%
KRW CASH 2.49%	State of California 0.11%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.46%	New York City Transitional Finance Autho 0.09%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 1.92%	Dallas Independent School District 0.09%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.60%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.09%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.57%	Ohio Water Development Authority Water P 0.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EWY and VTEB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF	VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	MSCI South Korea	Tax-Exempt Bond
Total return, 1 year	+147.9%	+0.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+130.4 pts	−17.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.03%
Holdings	80	10185

EWY in plain words

EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 61.9%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTEB in plain words

VTEB is a bond fund tracking the Tax-Exempt Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or VTEB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +147.9% and VTEB returned +0.2%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWY or VTEB?: EWY charges 0.59% a year and VTEB charges 0.03%, so VTEB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWY against VTEB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWY against VTEB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-vteb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources