Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and MTUM

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MTUM costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 61.3 points; EWY is 1.2 times larger.

EWY vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 202611.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$22.5bn$18.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
EWY MTUM
Return
Total return edge MTUM +238.1% +554.7%
Annualized edge MTUM +9.4% +14.9%
Price return edge MTUM +166.2% +459.1%
Risk
Volatility edge MTUM 26.3% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge MTUM −49.7% −31.9%
Downside capture 103.2% 101.7%
Beta 1.08 1.02
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MTUM 0.40 0.73
Sortino edge MTUM 0.59 1.07
Treynor 0.124 0.135
Calmar edge MTUM 0.19 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.5% a year +1.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.83 0.53
Information ratio 0.22 0.17
Tracking error 14.8% 9.3%

Each against its own benchmark: EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned more: +554.7% to +238.1%. MTUM swung less: 19.0% to 26.3%. MTUM fell less at its worst: −31.9% to −49.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWY vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYMTUMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+238.1%+554.7%MTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.4%+14.9%MTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+166.2%+459.1%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility26.3%19.0%MTUMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.9%13.0%MTUMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−49.7%−31.9%MTUMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.0%106.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture103.2%101.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.081.02Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.740.76Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.400.73MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.591.07MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1240.135Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.190.47MTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.5% a year+1.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.830.53Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.4% to +8.5%−3.7% to +6.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.220.17Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.8%9.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY MTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 93.2%
Holdings 78 126
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 $24.4bn $18.7bn

EWY and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F95DE6BFC5

EWY and MTUM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index and MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWY returned +79.7% and MTUM +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 61.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWY and MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or MTUM?
MTUM is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.