Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs IYR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to IYR's +3.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and IYR

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $24.4bn for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF and $3.9bn for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+3.4%
IYR total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.37%
IYR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IYR costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 76.3 points; EWY is 6.3 times larger.

EWY vs IYR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYIYR
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+3.4%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 20268.6%, high on Jul 28, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexDow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.37%
Net assets$24.4bn$3.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%52.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and IYR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY IYR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in IYR
WELLTOWER 9.85%
PROLOGIS REIT 8.77%
AMERICAN TOWER REIT 4.96%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 4.71%
EQUINIX REIT 4.57%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST REIT 4.54%
REALTY INCOME REIT 4.19%
PUBLIC STORAGE REIT 4.10%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of U.S. Real Estate
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.37%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 80.0%
Holdings 78 59
Net assets $24.4bn $3.9bn

EWY and IYR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY and IYR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IYR

IYR tracks an index of U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 52.5%. It sat 8.6% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or IYR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and IYR +3.4%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or IYR?
IYR is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and IYR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 80% of IYR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against IYR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-iyr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.