Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs FDVV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to FDVV's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and FDVV

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+13.5%
FDVV total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.15%
FDVV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FDVV costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 66.2 points; EWY is 2.6 times larger.

EWY vs FDVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYFDVV
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+13.5%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexFidelity High Dividend Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.15%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.2bn$10.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%33.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and FDVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY FDVV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in FDVV
NVIDIA CORP 6.57%
APPLE INC 6.18%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.88%
BROADCOM INC 3.11%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.76%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.66%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.96%
COCA COLA CO 1.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of High Dividend
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +13.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 87.4%
Holdings 78 95
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and FDVV as of Sep 30, 2026 $24.4bn $10.2bn

EWY and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FDVV

FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or FDVV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and FDVV +13.5%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or FDVV?
FDVV is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and FDVV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 87% of FDVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against FDVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-fdvv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.