Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWT vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to VGT's +24.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and VGT

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWT expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 45.2 points; VGT is 12.6 times larger.

EWT vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+69.9%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Taiwan 25/50 IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$12.3bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
EWT VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +862.2% +2,280.1%
Annualized edge VGT +10.4% +14.9%
Price return edge VGT +329.6% +1,863.7%
Risk
Volatility edge VGT (slight) 23.2% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge VGT (slight) −57.9% −52.4%
Downside capture 88.6% 99.9%
Beta 0.82 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.47 0.68
Sortino edge VGT 0.67 0.99
Treynor 0.155 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.18 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.5% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.63 0.80
Information ratio 0.19 0.19
Tracking error 13.9% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: EWT against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +2,280.1% to +862.2%. VGT swung slightly less: 21.2% to 23.2%. VGT fell slightly less at its worst: −52.4% to −57.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWT vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+862.2%+2,280.1%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.4%+14.9%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+329.6%+1,863.7%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.2%21.2%VGT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.3%14.4%VGTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−57.9%−52.4%VGT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture78.9%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.6%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.821.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.671.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.470.68VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.670.99VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1550.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.180.28VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.5% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.630.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.9% to +9.8%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.190.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error13.9%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT VGT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Only in VGT
NVIDIA Corp 17.58%
Apple Inc 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 11.16%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45%
Broadcom Inc 4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67%
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +69.9% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 86.8%
Holdings 79 320
Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $12.0bn $154.5bn

EWT and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0E39EE3208

EWT and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWT follows MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWT returned +69.9% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 45.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWT and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.