Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWT vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to QQQ's +15.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and QQQ

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $483.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.

At a glance
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQ total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWT expense ratio
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQ costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 54.7 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $11.8bn.

EWT vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTQQQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+69.9%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Taiwan 25/50 IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.8bn$483.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 30, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,373 weekly returns
EWT QQQ
Return
Total return edge QQQ +558.3% +794.4%
Annualized edge QQQ +7.4% +8.7%
Price return edge QQQ +179.7% +653.9%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQ (slight) 25.5% 23.0%
Max drawdown edge EWT −62.3% −80.2%
Downside capture 88.6% 100.2%
Beta 0.82 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQ 0.34 0.40
Sortino edge QQQ 0.48 0.57
Treynor 0.155 0.145
Calmar edge EWT (slight) 0.12 0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.5% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.63 −0.58
Information ratio 0.19 −0.10
Tracking error 13.9% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: EWT against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQ against QQQM, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQ returned more: +794.4% to +558.3%. QQQ swung slightly less: 23.0% to 25.5%. EWT fell less at its worst: −62.3% to −80.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWT vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTQQQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+558.3%+794.4%QQQPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.4%+8.7%QQQTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+179.7%+653.9%QQQPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility25.5%23.0%QQQ (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.9%16.2%QQQ (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−62.3%−80.2%EWTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture78.9%100.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.6%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.821.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.671.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.340.40QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.480.57QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1550.145Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.120.11EWT (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMQQQMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.5% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.63−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.9% to +9.8%−0.4% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.19−0.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error13.9%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,373 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and QQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT QQQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Only in QQQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +69.9% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +15.2% (QQQM)
Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM 0.0 pts vs QQQM
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 95.7%
Holdings 79 103
Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and QQQ as of Oct 27, 2026 $12.0bn $483.0bn

EWT and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-33727558C6

EWT and QQQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWT follows MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index and QQQ follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWT returned +69.9% and QQQ +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 54.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWT and QQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or QQQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and QQQ +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or QQQ?
QQQ is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWT and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 96% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against QQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-qqq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.