Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWT vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and PDBC

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWT expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.59% a year; their one-year returns differ by 14.3 points; EWT is 1.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

EWT vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+69.9%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Taiwan 25/50 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.8bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +69.9% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.59%
Holdings 79 1
Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $12.0bn $8.0bn

EWT and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWT and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or PDBC?
Neither: EWT and PDBC both charge 0.59% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.