Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWJ vs VTV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWJ returned +18.1% to VTV's +23.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWJ and VTV

Net assets: $23.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Japan ETF, and $184.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF.

At a glance
+18.1%
EWJ total return, 1 year
+23.5%
VTV total return, 1 year
0.49%
EWJ expense ratio
0.03%
VTV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTV costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.4 points; VTV is 7.8 times larger.

EWJ vs VTV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJVTV
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.1%+23.5%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Japan IndexMorningstar US Large Cap Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$23.5bn$184.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.5%23.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and VTV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWJ VTV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWJ
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.40%
TOYOTA MOTOR 3.59%
ADVANTEST 3.03%
HITACHI 3.03%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS LTD 3.03%
SONY GROUP 2.89%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 2.83%
TOKYO ELECTRON 2.55%
Only in VTV
Micron Technology Inc 4.56%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.33%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.92%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.56%
Johnson & Johnson 2.42%
AbbVie Inc 1.75%
Walmart Inc 1.72%
Chevron Corp 1.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Japan Tracks an index of US value
Total return, 1 year +18.1% +23.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +3.8 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 98.1%
Holdings 169 300
Net assets, EWJ as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTV as of Sep 30, 2026 $23.9bn $184.2bn

EWJ and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWJ

EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 29.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTV

VTV tracks an index of US value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 300 positions, with the top ten at 23.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or VTV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +18.1% and VTV +23.5%.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or VTV?
VTV is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWJ and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWJ and 98% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWJ against VTV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewj-vs-vtv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.