Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWJ vs FLJP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWJ and FLJP finished level, +18.1% against +18.1%, and they share 78% of their weight.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWJ and FLJP

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $23.9bn for iShares MSCI Japan ETF and $4.3bn for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF.

At a glance
+18.1%
EWJ total return, 1 year
+18.1%
FLJP total return, 1 year
0.49%
EWJ expense ratio
0.09%
FLJP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FLJP costs 0.40 points a year less; both returned +18.1% over a year; EWJ is 5.6 times larger.

EWJ vs FLJP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJFLJP
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.1%+18.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Oct 6, 20264.1%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Japan IndexFTSE Japan RIC Capped Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.09%
Net assets$23.9bn$4.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common78%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.5%25.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 466 weekly returns
EWJ FLJP
Return
Total return edge FLJP (slight) +92.3% +95.7%
Annualized edge FLJP (slight) +7.6% +7.8%
Price return edge EWJ (slight) +60.3% +55.4%
Risk
Volatility edge FLJP (slight) 18.1% 17.7%
Max drawdown edge Tie −32.5% −31.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FLJP (slight) 0.34 0.36
Sortino edge FLJP (slight) 0.49 0.51
Calmar edge FLJP (slight) 0.23 0.24
Reading

FLJP returned slightly more: +95.7% to +92.3%. FLJP swung slightly less: 17.7% to 18.1%. EWJ and FLJP fell about the same at their worst: −32.5% and −31.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWJ vs FLJP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJFLJPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+92.3%+95.7%FLJP (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.6%+7.8%FLJP (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+60.3%+55.4%EWJ (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.1%17.7%FLJP (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.6%12.4%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.5%−31.9%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.340.36FLJP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.490.51FLJP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.230.24FLJP (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 466 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

78%

By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and FLJP hold 78% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

78% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWJ FLJP
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.40% 3.46%
TOYOTA MOTOR 3.59% 2.89%
TOKYO ELECTRON 2.55% 3.37%
ADVANTEST 3.03% 2.33%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 2.83% 2.27%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP 2.03% 2.23%
HITACHI 3.03% 1.96%
SONY GROUP 2.89% 1.93%
MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP 2.15% 1.81%
KIOXIA HOLDINGS 1.77% 2.99%
KEYENCE 1.82% 1.51%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS LTD 3.03% 1.50%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWJ
AJINOMOTO 0.54%
SMC (JAPAN) CORP 0.41%
NIPPON YUSEN 0.34%
MITSUI OSK LINES LTD 0.31%
OSAKA GAS 0.24%
KAWASAKI KISEN LTD 0.15%
NIPPON BUILDING FUND REIT 0.11%
JPY/USD 0.00%
Only in FLJP
AJINOMOTO (JAPAN) COMPANY INC 0.55%
SMC CORP (JP) 0.39%
TAIYO YUDEN CO LTD 0.25%
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA 0.20%
NGK CORP 0.20%
NITERRA CO LTD 0.20%
OSAKA GAS CO LTD (OSAKA GAS KABUSHIKI KAISHA) 0.18%
YASKAWA ELECTRIC CORP 0.18%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Japan Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +18.1% +18.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +3.8 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 169 476
Net assets $23.9bn $4.3bn

EWJ and FLJP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

EWJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWJ

EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 29.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FLJP

FLJP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 476 positions, with the top ten at 25.4%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or FLJP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +18.1% and FLJP +18.1%.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or FLJP?
FLJP is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWJ and FLJP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWJ and 0% of FLJP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWJ against FLJP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewj-vs-fljp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.