Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ESML vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ESML returned +17.7% to VIOG's +15.8%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ESML and VIOG

Net assets: $2.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF, and $1.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+17.7%
ESML total return, 1 year
+15.8%
VIOG total return, 1 year
0.17%
ESML expense ratio
0.10%
VIOG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VIOG costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.9 points; ESML is 2.7 times larger.

ESML vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureESMLVIOG
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.7%+15.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.3%, high on Aug 14, 20268.2%, high on Aug 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.17%0.10%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$2.7bn$1.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common18%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.2%9.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
ESML VIOG
Return
Total return edge ESML +126.6% +97.2%
Annualized edge ESML +10.1% +8.3%
Price return edge ESML +104.3% +81.5%
Risk
Volatility edge ESML (slight) 22.8% 23.4%
Max drawdown edge Tie −40.6% −41.3%
Downside capture 104.1% 99.5%
Beta 1.11 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge ESML 0.41 0.34
Sortino edge ESML 0.59 0.49
Treynor 0.085 0.120
Calmar edge ESML 0.25 0.20
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.4% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.14 0.29
Information ratio −0.27 0.01
Tracking error 11.3% 2.1%

Each against its own benchmark: ESML against PBUS, Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026; VIOG against IJT, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

ESML returned more: +126.6% to +97.2%. ESML swung slightly less: 22.8% to 23.4%. ESML and VIOG fell about the same at their worst: −40.6% and −41.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ESML vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureESMLVIOGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+126.6%+97.2%ESMLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.1%+8.3%ESMLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+104.3%+81.5%ESMLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.8%23.4%ESML (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.0%16.3%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.6%−41.3%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture97.1%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture104.1%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.110.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.34ESMLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.590.49ESMLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0850.120Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.250.20ESMLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSIJTThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.4% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.140.29Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−11.9% to +3.2%−0.9% to +1.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.270.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.3%2.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

18%

By the books each fund has filed, ESML and VIOG hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

18% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ESML VIOG
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.32% 0.83%
FIRST BANCORP 0.32% 0.28%
GLAUKOS 0.23% 0.81%
ACI WORLDWIDE 0.21% 0.40%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.20% 0.99%
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC 0.19% 0.40%
PHILLIPS EDISON AND COMPANY 0.19% 0.34%
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES 0.17% 0.23%
FRONTDOOR INC 0.17% 0.61%
OUTFRONT MEDIA 0.17% 0.41%
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES 0.16% 0.83%
BADGER METER 0.16% 0.44%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ESML
MODERNA 1.13%
ASSURANT INC 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.58%
OVINTIV 0.51%
ONE GAS 0.40%
REVVITY 0.39%
DYNATRACE INC 0.38%
GUARDANT HEALTH 0.38%
Only in VIOG
MSG Knickerbockers Corp 0.85%
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.76%
Qorvo Inc 0.72%
Casella Waste Systems Inc 0.61%
Axos Financial Inc 0.60%
Arcosa Inc 0.56%
International Seaways Inc 0.56%
Construction Partners Inc 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +17.7% +15.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +15.4% (IJT)
Gap to its benchmark +4.4 pts vs PBUS +0.4 pts vs IJT
Expense ratio 0.17% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 12.3% 0.0%
Holdings 903 351
Net assets, ESML as of Oct 27, 2026 and VIOG as of Sep 30, 2026 $2.7bn $1.0bn

ESML and VIOG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-885F95C92A

ESML and VIOG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. ESML follows MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index and VIOG follows S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ESML returned +17.7% and VIOG +15.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ESML flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ESML

ESML tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.17% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 12% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 903 positions, with the top ten at 5.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VIOG

VIOG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 351 positions, with the top ten at 9.9%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ESML or VIOG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ESML returned +17.7% and VIOG +15.8%.
Which is cheaper, ESML or VIOG?
VIOG is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ESML and VIOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 12% of ESML and 0% of VIOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ESML against VIOG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/esml-vs-viog

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.