Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ESML vs IJR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ESML returned +17.7% to IJR's +17.5%; 27% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ESML and IJR

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.7bn for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF and $104.6bn for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+17.7%
ESML total return, 1 year
+17.5%
IJR total return, 1 year
0.17%
ESML expense ratio
0.06%
IJR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJR costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; IJR is far larger, $104.6bn against $2.7bn.

ESML vs IJR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureESMLIJR
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.7%+17.5%
Drawdown
Below its high5.3%, high on Aug 14, 20266.8%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus IndexS&P SmallCap 600
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.17%0.06%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.7bn$104.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.2%5.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
ESML IJR
Return
Total return edge ESML +126.6% +99.0%
Annualized edge ESML +10.1% +8.4%
Price return edge ESML +104.3% +74.8%
Risk
Volatility edge ESML (slight) 22.8% 23.8%
Max drawdown edge ESML (slight) −40.6% −43.6%
Downside capture 104.1% 98.9%
Beta 1.11 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge ESML 0.41 0.34
Sortino edge ESML 0.59 0.49
Treynor 0.085 0.097
Calmar edge ESML 0.25 0.19
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.4% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.14 0.91
Information ratio −0.27 0.20
Tracking error 11.3% 2.4%

Each against its own benchmark: ESML against PBUS, Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026; IJR against SPSM, Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

ESML returned more: +126.6% to +99.0%. ESML swung slightly less: 22.8% to 23.8%. ESML fell slightly less at its worst: −40.6% to −43.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ESML vs IJR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureESMLIJREdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+126.6%+99.0%ESMLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.1%+8.4%ESMLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+104.3%+74.8%ESMLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.8%23.8%ESML (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.0%16.6%ESML (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.6%−43.6%ESML (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture97.1%98.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture104.1%98.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.110.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.34ESMLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.590.49ESMLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0850.097Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.250.19ESMLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSSPSMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.4% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.140.91Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−11.9% to +3.2%−0.7% to +1.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.270.20Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.3%2.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

27%

By the books each fund has filed, ESML and IJR hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

27% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ESML IJR
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.32% 0.41%
FIRST BANCORP 0.32% 0.23%
GLAUKOS 0.23% 0.61%
ACI WORLDWIDE 0.21% 0.31%
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.21% 0.57%
ADT INC 0.20% 0.21%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.20% 0.51%
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC 0.19% 0.32%
PHILLIPS EDISON AND COMPANY 0.19% 0.28%
FULTON FINANCIAL 0.18% 0.25%
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES 0.17% 0.18%
FRONTDOOR INC 0.17% 0.33%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ESML
MODERNA 1.13%
ASSURANT INC 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.58%
OVINTIV 0.51%
ONE GAS 0.40%
REVVITY 0.39%
DYNATRACE INC 0.38%
GUARDANT HEALTH 0.38%
Only in IJR
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.43%
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES 0.36%
MAGNOLIA OIL GAS CORP CLASS A 0.36%
LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS 0.35%
CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS CLASS A 0.33%
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP 0.33%
MOBILITY GLOBAL INC 0.30%
MSG KNICKERBOCKERS CLASS A 0.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the S&P SmallCap 600
Total return, 1 year +17.7% +17.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +17.6% (SPSM)
Gap to its benchmark +4.4 pts vs PBUS −0.1 pts vs SPSM
Expense ratio 0.17% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 12.3% 0.0%
Holdings 903 642
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.7bn $104.6bn

ESML and IJR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-E72D9714E9

ESML and IJR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. ESML follows MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index and IJR follows S&P SmallCap 600.
  2. Holdings in common. 27% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. Cost. ESML charges 0.17% of assets a year and IJR 0.06%, a gap of 0.11 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ESML and IJR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ESML

ESML tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.17% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 12% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 903 positions, with the top ten at 5.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IJR

IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 642 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ESML or IJR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ESML returned +17.7% and IJR +17.5%.
Which is cheaper, ESML or IJR?
IJR is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ESML and IJR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 12% of ESML and 0% of IJR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ESML against IJR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/esml-vs-ijr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.