Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EQWL vs HDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EQWL returned +15.1% to HDV's +29.4%; 20% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EQWL and HDV
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.8bn for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF and $15.9bn for iShares Core High Dividend ETF.
Pair scorecard
HDV costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.3 points; HDV is 5.7 times larger.
| Measure | EQWL | HDV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.1% | +29.4% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 100 Equal Weight Index | Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $2.8bn | $15.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.9% | 55.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 8, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 811 weekly returnsEQWL returned more: +608.7% to +414.1%. HDV swung less: 13.9% to 15.5%. EQWL and HDV fell about the same at their worst: −32.9% and −33.4%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EQWL | HDV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +608.7% | +414.1% | EQWL | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.4% | +11.1% | EQWL | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +417.2% | +197.8% | EQWL | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.5% | 13.9% | HDV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.8% | 9.8% | HDV (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.9% | −33.4% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.78 | 0.71 | EQWL (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.13 | 1.00 | EQWL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.41 | 0.33 | EQWL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 811 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EQWL and HDV hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
20% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EQWL and HDV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EQWL and HDV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. EQWL follows S&P 100 Equal Weight Index and HDV follows Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index.
- Holdings in common. 20% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EQWL returned +15.1% and HDV +29.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EQWL
EQWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 11.9%.
HDV
HDV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EQWL or HDV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EQWL returned +15.1% and HDV +29.4%.
- Which is cheaper, EQWL or HDV?
- HDV is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EQWL against HDV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eqwl-vs-hdv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EQWL against HDV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eqwl-vs-hdv
[EQWL against HDV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eqwl-vs-hdv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.