Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EPOL vs HDEF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EPOL returned +32.2% to HDEF's +17.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EPOL and HDEF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.0bn for iShares MSCI Poland ETF and $2.3bn for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF.

At a glance
+32.2%
EPOL total return, 1 year
+17.8%
HDEF total return, 1 year
0.59%
EPOL expense ratio
0.09%
HDEF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

HDEF costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.4 points; HDEF is 2.3 times larger.

EPOL vs HDEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEPOLHDEF
Return
Total return, 1 year+32.2%+17.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Sep 8, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Poland IMI 25/50 IndexMSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.0bn$2.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund65.9%41.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EPOL and HDEF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EPOL HDEF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EPOL
POWSZECHNA KASA OSZCZEDNOSCI BANK 14.92%
ORLEN 13.14%
BANK PEKAO SA 6.85%
PZU SA 6.01%
ALLEGRO SA 5.58%
LPP SA 4.65%
ERSTE BANK POLSKA SA 4.53%
KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SA 3.74%
Only in HDEF
ROCHE HOLDING AG 5.02%
NESTLE' SA/AG 4.99%
NOVARTIS AG 4.98%
SHELL PLC 4.75%
TOTALENERGIES SE 4.21%
ALLIANZ SE 4.14%
NOVO NORDISK A/S 3.59%
IBERDROLA SA 3.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +32.2% +17.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +12.1% (EFA)
Gap to its benchmark +15.9 pts vs EEM +5.7 pts vs EFA
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 33 114
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.0bn $2.3bn

EPOL and HDEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EPOL and HDEF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EPOL

EPOL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +32.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 33 positions, with the top ten at 65.9%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Sep 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

HDEF

HDEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 41.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EPOL or HDEF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EPOL returned +32.2% and HDEF +17.8%.
Which is cheaper, EPOL or HDEF?
HDEF is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EPOL and HDEF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EPOL and 0% of HDEF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EPOL against HDEF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/epol-vs-hdef

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.