Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to VHT's +25.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and VHT

Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+25.0%
VHT total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.09%
VHT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VHT costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points; EMXC is 1.3 times larger.

EMXC vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCVHT
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+25.0%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$25.3bn$19.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%51.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returns
EMXC VHT
Return
Total return edge VHT +122.9% +158.6%
Annualized edge VHT +9.1% +10.8%
Price return edge VHT +80.5% +125.6%
Risk
Volatility edge VHT (slight) 19.2% 17.7%
Max drawdown edge VHT −40.7% −25.6%
Downside capture 97.9% 100.2%
Beta 0.97 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VHT 0.41 0.52
Sortino edge VHT 0.57 0.74
Treynor 0.098 0.103
Calmar edge VHT 0.22 0.42
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.8% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.59 0.17
Information ratio −0.30 0.15
Tracking error 3.6% 0.8%

Each against its own benchmark: EMXC against KEMX, Apr 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; VHT against FHLC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VHT returned more: +158.6% to +122.9%. VHT swung slightly less: 17.7% to 19.2%. VHT fell less at its worst: −25.6% to −40.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMXC vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCVHTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+122.9%+158.6%VHTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+10.8%VHTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+80.5%+125.6%VHTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.2%17.7%VHT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%12.4%VHTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.7%−25.6%VHTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture92.3%100.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.9%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.971.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.971.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.52VHTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.74VHTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.103Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.42VHTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkKEMXFHLCThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.8% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.590.17Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +1.8%−0.4% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.300.15Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.6%0.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and VHT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC VHT
MOTOR OIL (HELLAS) CORINTH REFINER 0.05% 0.14%
BUDIMEX SA 0.03% 0.69%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in VHT
Eli Lilly & Co 12.95%
Johnson & Johnson 8.79%
AbbVie Inc 6.46%
Merck & Co Inc 5.02%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.66%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.51%
Amgen Inc 3.18%
Gilead Sciences Inc 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks an index of Health Care
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +25.4% (FHLC)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX −0.4 pts vs FHLC
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 85.5%
Holdings 696 414
Net assets, EMXC as of Oct 28, 2026 and VHT as of Sep 30, 2026 $26.9bn $19.1bn

EMXC and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-CAC4BC7D0F

EMXC and VHT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and VHT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and VHT +25.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMXC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or VHT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and VHT +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or VHT?
VHT is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-vht

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.