Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to SPMO's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and SPMO

Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF, and $22.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPMO costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.4 points; EMXC is 1.2 times larger.

EMXC vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 202610.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.13%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$26.4bn$22.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returns
EMXC SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +122.9% +403.2%
Annualized edge SPMO +9.1% +19.1%
Price return edge SPMO +80.5% +351.4%
Risk
Volatility edge EMXC (slight) 19.2% 20.3%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −40.7% −28.3%
Downside capture 97.9% 93.8%
Beta 0.97 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO 0.41 0.83
Sortino edge SPMO 0.57 1.25
Treynor 0.098 0.164
Calmar edge SPMO 0.22 0.67
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.8% a year +3.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.59 1.28
Information ratio −0.30 0.36
Tracking error 3.6% 9.7%

Each against its own benchmark: EMXC against KEMX, Apr 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPMO returned more: +403.2% to +122.9%. EMXC swung slightly less: 19.2% to 20.3%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −28.3% to −40.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMXC vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+122.9%+403.2%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+19.1%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+80.5%+351.4%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.2%20.3%EMXC (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%13.5%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.7%−28.3%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture92.3%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.9%93.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.970.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.970.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.83SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.571.25SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.164Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.67SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkKEMXVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.8% a year+3.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.591.28Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +1.8%−2.0% to +9.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.300.36Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.6%9.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and SPMO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC SPMO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in SPMO
Apple Inc 9.95%
Micron Technology Inc 8.80%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.48%
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Intel Corp 4.60%
Alphabet Inc 3.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.13%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 100.0%
Holdings 696 101
Net assets, EMXC as of Oct 28, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026 $26.9bn $22.3bn

EMXC and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-77FAAEE232

EMXC and SPMO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and SPMO +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 15.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMXC and SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or SPMO?
SPMO is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.