Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and SCHG

Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.0 points.

EMXC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.04%
Net assets, EMXC as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$26.9bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returns
EMXC SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +122.9% +354.5%
Annualized edge SCHG +9.1% +17.8%
Price return edge SCHG +80.5% +328.2%
Risk
Volatility edge EMXC (slight) 19.2% 21.1%
Max drawdown edge SCHG −40.7% −34.2%
Downside capture 97.9% 108.1%
Beta 0.97 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG 0.41 0.76
Sortino edge SCHG 0.57 1.13
Treynor 0.098 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.22 0.52
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.8% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.59 0.65
Information ratio −0.30 0.40
Tracking error 3.6% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: EMXC against KEMX, Apr 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +354.5% to +122.9%. EMXC swung slightly less: 19.2% to 21.1%. SCHG fell less at its worst: −34.2% to −40.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMXC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+122.9%+354.5%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+17.8%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+80.5%+328.2%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.2%21.1%EMXC (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%14.1%EMXC (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.7%−34.2%SCHGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture92.3%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.9%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.971.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.970.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.76SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.571.13SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.52SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkKEMXIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.8% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.590.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +1.8%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.300.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.6%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC SCHG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 10.67%
Apple Inc 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Broadcom Inc 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 94.7%
Holdings 696 192
Net assets, EMXC as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $26.9bn $63.0bn

EMXC and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1AF91509B3

EMXC and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 27.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMXC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.