Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to RSP's +16.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and RSP

Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF, and $99.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+16.0%
RSP total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.20%
RSP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RSP costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.8 points; RSP is 3.8 times larger.

EMXC vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCRSP
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+16.0%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexS&P 500 Equal Weight Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$26.4bn$99.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%2.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returns
EMXC RSP
Return
Total return edge RSP +122.9% +171.3%
Annualized edge RSP +9.1% +11.4%
Price return edge RSP +80.5% +130.7%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 19.2% 18.9%
Max drawdown edge RSP (slight) −40.7% −36.7%
Downside capture 97.9% 102.9%
Beta 0.97 1.07
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RSP 0.41 0.53
Sortino edge RSP 0.57 0.75
Treynor 0.098 0.098
Calmar edge RSP 0.22 0.31
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.8% a year −0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.59 −0.57
Information ratio −0.30 0.02
Tracking error 3.6% 5.4%

Each against its own benchmark: EMXC against KEMX, Apr 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; RSP against IVV, May 9, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

RSP returned more: +171.3% to +122.9%. EMXC and RSP swung about the same: 19.2% and 18.9%. RSP fell slightly less at its worst: −36.7% to −40.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMXC vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCRSPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+122.9%+171.3%RSPPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+11.4%RSPTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+80.5%+130.7%RSPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.2%18.9%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%13.3%RSP (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.7%−36.7%RSP (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture92.3%104.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.9%102.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.971.07Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.970.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.53RSPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.75RSPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.098Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.31RSPAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkKEMXIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.8% a year−0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.59−0.57Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.3% to +1.8%−2.8% to +1.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.300.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.6%5.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and RSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC RSP
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD 0.09% 0.19%
BUDIMEX SA 0.03% 0.21%
PLDT INC 0.01% 0.22%
COP/USD 0.00% 0.21%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in RSP
Moderna Inc 0.30%
PTC Inc 0.30%
Everpure Inc 0.28%
Illumina Inc 0.27%
Accenture PLC 0.27%
Hasbro Inc 0.26%
Mettler-Toledo International Inc 0.26%
Revvity Inc 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks the S&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +16.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX +2.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.8%
Holdings 696 508
Net assets, EMXC as of Oct 28, 2026 and RSP as of Oct 27, 2026 $26.9bn $99.8bn

EMXC and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-D7CC9EFBCD

EMXC and RSP do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and RSP follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and RSP +16.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMXC and RSP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

RSP

RSP tracks the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 2.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or RSP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and RSP +16.0%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or RSP?
RSP is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMXC and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 100% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against RSP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-rsp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.