Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and PDBC

Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EMXC costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.8 points; EMXC is 3.3 times larger.

EMXC vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$26.4bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.59%
Holdings 696 1
Net assets, EMXC as of Oct 28, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $26.9bn $8.0bn

EMXC and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMXC and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or PDBC?
EMXC is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.