Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EMB vs FDVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to FDVV's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EMB and FDVV
Net assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF.
Pair scorecard
FDVV costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.9 points; EMB is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | EMB | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | +13.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index | Fidelity High Dividend Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $12.9bn | $10.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 87% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EMB and FDVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EMB and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMB or FDVV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and FDVV +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, EMB or FDVV?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EMB against FDVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-fdvv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EMB against FDVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-fdvv
[EMB against FDVV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-fdvv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.