Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EFA vs ONEQ: how they differ
EFA and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EFA and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EFA | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING 3.01% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.61% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| SHELL PLC 1.25% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.15% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| NOVARTIS AG 1.15% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| NESTLE SA 1.12% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.09% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Developed markets ex US | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.2% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.7 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 670 | 1022 |
EFA in plain words
EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EFA or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EFA or ONEQ?
- EFA charges 0.32% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EFA and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against ONEQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-oneq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources