Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EEM vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to REMX's −19.2%, and REMX charges 0.53% to EEM's 0.72%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EEM and REMX
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $29.1bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and $1.5bn for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.
Pair scorecard
REMX costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 35.5 points; EEM is 19.4 times larger.
| Measure | EEM | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | −19.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Emerging Markets Index | Rare earth and critical materials |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.53% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $29.1bn | $1.5bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.2% | 61% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 5, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 833 weekly returnsEEM returned more: +79.6% to −68.2%. EEM swung less: 19.6% to 35.3%. EEM fell less at its worst: −39.1% to −89.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EEM | REMX | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +79.6% | −68.2% | EEM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.7% | −6.9% | EEM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +27.9% | −79.7% | EEM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.6% | 35.3% | EEM | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.9% | 24.5% | EEM | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −39.1% | −89.2% | EEM | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.20 | −0.07 | EEM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.29 | −0.10 | EEM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.10 | −0.08 | EEM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 833 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EEM and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EEM and REMX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EEM follows MSCI Emerging Markets Index and REMX follows Rare earth and critical materials.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EEM returned +16.3% and REMX −19.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 35.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EEM
EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Are EEM and REMX in the same category?
- EEM is a stock ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or REMX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and REMX −19.2%.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or REMX?
- REMX is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EEM against REMX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-remx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EEM against REMX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-remx
[EEM against REMX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-remx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.