Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EEM vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EEM returned +16.3% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EEM and MAGS

Net assets: $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.72%
EEM expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; EEM is 5.3 times larger.

EEM vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEEMMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.30%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$29.1bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EEM and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EEM MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EEM
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.98%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.88%
SK HYNIX 4.91%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.64%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82%
MEDIATEK 1.54%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.94%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.91%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Emerging markets Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.3% +5.8%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 1186 8
Net assets, EEM as of Oct 27, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $29.1bn $5.5bn

EEM and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EEM and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EEM or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +16.3% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, EEM or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EEM and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EEM against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.