Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EEM vs IWF: how they differ
EEM and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EEM and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EEM | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| NU HOLDINGS CLASS A | 0.43% | 0.16% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| AURA MINERALS INC | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| MTN GROUP | 0.17% | 0.01% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORP | 0.14% | 0.01% |
| Only in EEM | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.18% | NVIDIA 15.46% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 7.46% | APPLE 7.77% |
| SK HYNIX 6.07% | ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.65% | MICROSOFT 5.55% |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82% | BROADCOM INC 5.10% |
| MEDIATEK 1.71% | ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.97% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Emerging markets | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 965 | 315 |
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 965 positions, with the top ten at 38.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EEM or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EEM returned +32.3% and IWF returned +7.0%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EEM or IWF?
- EEM charges 0.72% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EEM and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EEM and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EEM against IWF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eem-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources