Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EDV vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
EDV's duration was 23.3 years on May 31, 2026 and TLT's 15.1 on Aug 31, 2026; EDV charges 0.05% to TLT's 0.15%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EDV and TLT
Net assets: $3.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
EDV costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.4 points; TLT is 12.8 times larger.
| Measure | EDV | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −13.3% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 57.0%, high on Mar 9, 2020 | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Year Equal Par Bond Index | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $3.6bn | $46.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 21, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 983 weekly returnsTLT returned slightly more: +58.5% to +55.0%. TLT swung less: 14.4% to 21.4%. TLT fell less at its worst: −47.8% to −59.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EDV | TLT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +55.0% | +58.5% | TLT (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.3% | +2.5% | TLT (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −38.6% | −11.3% | TLT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.4% | 14.4% | TLT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.9% | 10.1% | TLT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −59.7% | −47.8% | TLT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.15 | 0.14 | EDV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.21 | 0.20 | EDV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.04 | 0.05 | TLT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 983 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EDV and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EDV and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EDV and TLT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. EDV follows Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Year Equal Par Bond Index and TLT follows ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EDV returned −13.3% and TLT −7.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EDV
EDV tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −13.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 57.0% below its high of Mar 9, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EDV or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EDV returned −13.3% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, EDV or TLT?
- EDV is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EDV against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EDV against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-tlt
[EDV against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.