Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs IWO: how they differ
DYNF and IWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| USD CASH | 0.13% | 0.14% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.06% | 0.11% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in IWO |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 8.13% | MOOG INC CLASS A 0.69% |
| APPLE 7.62% | GLAUKOS 0.65% |
| MICROSOFT 4.75% | JFROG 0.64% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.09% | BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.62% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46% | FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC 0.62% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.61% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.59% | INTERDIGITAL INC 0.60% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.42% | KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Russell 2000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +17.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 234 | 970 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.
IWO in plain words
IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 970 positions, with the top ten at 6.2%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IWO?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IWO returned +17.0%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or IWO?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IWO charges 0.24%, so IWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IWO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-iwo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources