Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs IWM: how they differ
DYNF and IWM hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IWM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| USD CASH | 0.13% | 0.17% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.06% | 0.29% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in IWM |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 8.13% | MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34% |
| APPLE 7.62% | UMB FINANCIAL 0.34% |
| MICROSOFT 4.75% | CYTOKINETICS 0.32% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.09% | GLAUKOS 0.32% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46% | JFROG 0.32% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73% | BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.31% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.59% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.31% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.42% | FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC 0.31% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Russell 2000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +21.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +3.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.19% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 234 | 1749 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.
IWM in plain words
IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1749 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IWM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or IWM?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against IWM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-iwm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources