Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DYNF vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DYNF returned +14.5% to IEMG's +15.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYNF and IEMG

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $42.7bn for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and $150.4bn for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
+14.5%
DYNF total return, 1 year
+15.3%
IEMG total return, 1 year
0.26%
DYNF expense ratio
0.09%
IEMG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEMG costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; IEMG is 3.5 times larger.

DYNF vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFIEMG
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.5%+15.3%
Drawdown
Below its high10.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI)
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.26%0.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$42.7bn$150.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund40.7%32.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 395 weekly returns
DYNF IEMG
Return
Total return edge DYNF +202.7% +80.1%
Annualized edge DYNF +15.7% +8.1%
Price return edge DYNF +170.1% +46.5%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 19.3% 19.2%
Max drawdown edge DYNF −32.7% −36.5%
Downside capture 102.2% 97.1%
Beta 1.03 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DYNF 0.71 0.35
Sortino edge DYNF 1.02 0.49
Treynor 0.132 0.057
Calmar edge DYNF 0.48 0.22
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.05 2.17
Information ratio 0.09 0.38
Tracking error 3.9% 1.4%

Each against its own benchmark: DYNF against PBUS, Mar 29, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; IEMG against EEM, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

DYNF returned more: +202.7% to +80.1%. DYNF and IEMG swung about the same: 19.3% and 19.2%. DYNF fell less at its worst: −32.7% to −36.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DYNF vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDYNFIEMGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+202.7%+80.1%DYNFPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.7%+8.1%DYNFTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+170.1%+46.5%DYNFPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.3%19.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.4%13.8%DYNF (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.7%−36.5%DYNFDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture104.8%94.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture102.2%97.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.030.96Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.961.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.35DYNFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.020.49DYNFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1320.057Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.480.22DYNFAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSEEMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.7% a yearDYNF not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.052.17Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.9% to +2.7%+0.1% to +1.4%DYNF includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.090.38Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.9%1.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 395 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and IEMG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYNF IEMG
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 0.04% 0.33%
FIVE BELOW 0.08% 0.00%
MILLROSE PROPERTIES INC CLASS A 0.00% 0.02%
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.00% 0.04%
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.00% 0.35%
SEMPRA 0.00% 0.00%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DYNF
NVIDIA 8.15%
APPLE 8.14%
MICROSOFT 4.76%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.12%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.30%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.99%
BROADCOM INC 2.46%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.34%
Only in IEMG
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 14.03%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.05%
SK HYNIX 4.31%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.32%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.60%
MEDIATEK 1.36%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.80%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets
Total return, 1 year +14.5% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark +1.2 pts vs PBUS −1.0 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 94.8% 0.0%
Holdings 262 2857
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $42.7bn $150.4bn

DYNF and IEMG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-21694AF7CA

DYNF and IEMG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. DYNF follows No index, actively managed and IEMG follows MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI).
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. Number of holdings. DYNF holds 262 positions and IEMG holds 2857.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

DYNF and IEMG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DYNF

DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.

IEMG

IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or IEMG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +14.5% and IEMG +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or IEMG?
IEMG is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and IEMG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DYNF and 0% of IEMG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYNF against IEMG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-iemg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.