Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs EWY: how they differ

DYNF and EWY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWY returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and EWY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and EWY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFEWY
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.06%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in EWY
NVIDIA 8.13%SK HYNIX 24.02%
APPLE 7.62%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 22.13%
MICROSOFT 4.75%SK SQUARE 3.01%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.09%KRW CASH 2.49%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.46%SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.46%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.73%KB FINANCIAL GROUP 1.92%
BROADCOM INC 2.59%HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.60%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.42%SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DYNF and EWY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveMSCI South Korea
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+147.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+130.4 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.59%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%0.0%
Holdings23480

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 234 positions, with the top ten at 40.3%.

EWY in plain words

EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 61.9%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or EWY?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and EWY returned +147.9%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or EWY?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and EWY charges 0.59%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and EWY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of EWY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against EWY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against EWY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dynf-vs-ewy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources