Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DRAM vs FLKR: Differences, Returns & Fees
DRAM and FLKR are measured over different days, and FLKR charges 0.09% to DRAM's 0.65%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DRAM and FLKR
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $20.6bn for Roundhill Memory ETF and $1.9bn for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.
Pair scorecard
FLKR costs 0.56 points a year less; DRAM is 10.8 times larger.
| Measure | DRAM | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +79.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Below its high | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Memory and storage | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Net assets | $20.6bn | $1.9bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 97% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56% | 64.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 10, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 28 weekly returnsDRAM returned more: +45.1% to +12.3%. FLKR fell less at its worst: −30.0% to −39.4%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DRAM | FLKR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +45.1% | +12.3% | DRAM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | +45.1% | +11.8% | DRAM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −39.4% | −30.0% | FLKR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 28 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and FLKR hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DRAM and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for DRAM.
DRAM
By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are DRAM and FLKR in the same category?
- DRAM is a thematic ETF and FLKR is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which is cheaper, DRAM or FLKR?
- FLKR is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DRAM against FLKR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dram-vs-flkr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DRAM against FLKR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dram-vs-flkr
[DRAM against FLKR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dram-vs-flkr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.