Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DGRW vs GDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DGRW returned +11.1% to GDX's +19.0%, and DGRW charges 0.28% to GDX's 0.51%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DGRW and GDX
Net assets: $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund, and $25.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Gold Miners ETF.
Pair scorecard
DGRW costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points.
| Measure | DGRW | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.1% | +19.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 27.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index | Gold miners |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 5.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.51% |
| Net assets, DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 and GDX as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.6bn | $25.6bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 60% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
May 31, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 699 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: DGRW against VOO, May 31, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; GDX against ACWI, Apr 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026.
DGRW returned more: +418.8% to +207.1%. DGRW swung less: 14.7% to 37.5%. DGRW fell less at its worst: −29.8% to −55.7%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DGRW | GDX | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +418.8% | +207.1% | DGRW | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.0% | +8.7% | DGRW | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +299.2% | +171.9% | DGRW | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 14.7% | 37.5% | DGRW | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.3% | 25.5% | DGRW | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −29.8% | −55.7% | DGRW | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 85.5% | 50.2% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 92.1% | 74.9% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.89 | 0.76 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.94 | 0.13 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.78 | 0.36 | DGRW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.11 | 0.53 | DGRW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.128 | 0.127 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.44 | 0.16 | DGRW | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | VOO | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.2% a year | +3.4% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.19 | 0.41 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −1.7% to +2.1% | −13.0% to +19.9% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.29 | 0.04 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 4.0% | 36.4% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 699 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and GDX hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DGRW and GDX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
GDX
By weight, 12% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 5.6 pts. It sits 27.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are DGRW and GDX in the same category?
- DGRW is a stock ETF and GDX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or GDX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +11.1% and GDX +19.0%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or GDX?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRW against GDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-gdx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DGRW against GDX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-gdx
[DGRW against GDX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-gdx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.