Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs PFF: how they differ

DGRO and PFF hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and PFF hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and PFF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROPFF
ORACLE0.53%2.31%
CITIGROUP0.92%0.37%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO3.20%0.32%
XCEL ENERGY INC0.31%0.38%
SEMPRA0.35%0.29%
WELLS FARGO1.32%0.28%
NEXTERA ENERGY1.10%0.26%
ARES MANAGEMENT CLASS A0.25%0.61%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP0.35%0.24%
METLIFE0.32%0.24%
DUKE ENERGY CORP0.70%0.21%
STATE STREET0.23%0.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in PFF
MICROSOFT 3.45%BOEING CO 3.54%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20%SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC 2.30%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07%ALPHABET INC 2.24%
APPLE 3.04%HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CONV PR 2.06%
ABBVIE 3.02%ALBEMARLE CORP 1.12%
BROADCOM INC 2.38%BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES UNITS 0.74%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16%NEXTERA ENERGY UNITS 0.70%
MERCK & CO INC 2.14%BRUKER CORPORATION 0.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DGRO and PFF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthPreferred and Income Securities
Total return, 1 year+17.4%−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−18.3 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.45%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%21.6%
Holdings387461

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

PFF in plain words

PFF is an index equity fund tracking the Preferred and Income Securities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 3.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or PFF?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and PFF returned −0.8%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or PFF?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and PFF charges 0.45%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and PFF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 22% of PFF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against PFF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against PFF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-pff Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources