Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DGRO vs EQWL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DGRO returned +18.8% to EQWL's +15.1%; 45% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DGRO and EQWL
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $44.6bn for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and $2.8bn for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF.
Pair scorecard
DGRO costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points; DGRO is 15.9 times larger.
| Measure | DGRO | EQWL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.8% | +15.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index | S&P 100 Equal Weight Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $44.6bn | $2.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 27.2% | 11.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 20, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026 · 644 weekly returnsEQWL returned slightly more: +334.3% to +321.3%. DGRO swung slightly less: 15.3% to 16.0%. DGRO fell slightly less at its worst: −32.1% to −32.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DGRO | EQWL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +321.3% | +334.3% | EQWL (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.3% | +12.6% | EQWL (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +216.7% | +240.8% | EQWL | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.3% | 16.0% | DGRO (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.7% | 11.2% | DGRO (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.1% | −32.9% | DGRO (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.70 | 0.70 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.00 | 0.99 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.38 | 0.38 | Tie | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 644 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and EQWL hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
45% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DGRO and EQWL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO and EQWL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. DGRO follows Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index and EQWL follows S&P 100 Equal Weight Index.
- Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DGRO returned +18.8% and EQWL +15.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
DGRO
DGRO tracks an index of Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 393 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
EQWL
EQWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 11.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or EQWL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +18.8% and EQWL +15.1%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRO or EQWL?
- DGRO is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRO against EQWL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-eqwl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DGRO against EQWL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-eqwl
[DGRO against EQWL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-eqwl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.