Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DFUS vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DFUS returned +13.8% to NOBL's +15.5%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DFUS and NOBL
Net assets: $20.9bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
DFUS costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.
| Measure | DFUS | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +15.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 | $20.9bn | $11.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 34.6% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 278 weekly returnsDFUS returned more: +87.6% to +43.4%. NOBL swung less: 14.1% to 16.2%. NOBL fell less at its worst: −17.5% to −24.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DFUS | NOBL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +87.6% | +43.4% | DFUS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.5% | +7.0% | DFUS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +76.2% | +28.4% | DFUS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.2% | 14.1% | NOBL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.8% | 9.8% | NOBL (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −24.2% | −17.5% | NOBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.58 | 0.29 | DFUS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.87 | 0.41 | DFUS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.52 | 0.40 | DFUS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 278 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and NOBL hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
9% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DFUS and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS and NOBL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. DFUS follows No index, actively managed and NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
- Holdings in common. 9% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- Number of holdings. DFUS holds 2,236 positions and NOBL holds 69.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
DFUS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,236 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +13.8% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, DFUS or NOBL?
- DFUS is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFUS against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfus-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DFUS against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfus-vs-nobl
[DFUS against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfus-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.