Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DFUS vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DFUS returned +13.8% to IWF's +0.9%; 51% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DFUS and IWF

Net assets: $20.9bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+13.8%
DFUS total return, 1 year
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
0.09%
DFUS expense ratio
0.18%
IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DFUS costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.9 points.

DFUS vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDFUSIWF
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+0.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.18%
Net assets, DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 and IWF as of Oct 27, 2026$20.9bn$124.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common51%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.6%57.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 278 weekly returns
DFUS IWF
Return
Total return edge DFUS (slight) +87.6% +83.3%
Annualized edge DFUS (slight) +12.5% +12.0%
Price return edge IWF (slight) +76.2% +77.8%
Risk
Volatility edge DFUS 16.2% 20.3%
Max drawdown edge DFUS −24.2% −32.5%
Downside capture 99.4% 100.1%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DFUS 0.58 0.48
Sortino edge DFUS 0.87 0.72
Treynor 0.094 0.149
Calmar edge DFUS 0.52 0.37
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.33 −0.58
Information ratio 1.04 −0.11
Tracking error 0.8% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: DFUS against IWV, Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026; IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

DFUS returned slightly more: +87.6% to +83.3%. DFUS swung less: 16.2% to 20.3%. DFUS fell less at its worst: −24.2% to −32.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DFUS vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDFUSIWFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+87.6%+83.3%DFUS (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.5%+12.0%DFUS (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+76.2%+77.8%IWF (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.2%20.3%DFUSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.8%13.4%DFUSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.2%−32.5%DFUSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture101.4%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.4%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.48DFUSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.72DFUSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0940.149Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.520.37DFUSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVVONGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year−0.1% a yearIWF not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.33−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range+0.1% to +1.5%−0.6% to +0.3%IWF includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio1.04−0.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.8%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 278 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

51%

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and IWF hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

51% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DFUS IWF
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.75% 15.30%
APPLE INC. 6.45% 8.18%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.99% 5.94%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00% 5.62%
BROADCOM INC. 2.63% 4.79%
ALPHABET INC. 2.48% 4.53%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.77% 3.36%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.35% 3.15%
TESLA, INC. 1.27% 3.58%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 1.12% 2.74%
VISA INC. 0.88% 2.05%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 0.68% 1.48%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DFUS
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.38%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.37%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.33%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0.94%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.90%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 0.67%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.62%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 0.58%
Only in IWF
ELI LILLY 3.08%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.94%
GE AEROSPACE 0.93%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.85%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 0.31%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 0.25%
TJX 0.21%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 0.20%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year +13.8% +0.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +1.1% (VONG)
Gap to its benchmark +0.5 pts vs IWV −0.2 pts vs VONG
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 89.4% 93.5%
Holdings 2236 374
Net assets, DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 and IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 $20.9bn $124.7bn

DFUS and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7C1037AE1E

DFUS and IWF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. DFUS follows No index, actively managed and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DFUS returned +13.8% and IWF +0.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.9 points.
  3. Number of holdings. DFUS holds 2,236 positions and IWF holds 374.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DFUS

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

DFUS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,236 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or IWF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +13.8% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or IWF?
DFUS is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 89% of DFUS and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFUS against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfus-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.