Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

DFUS vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DFUS returned +13.8% to DGRW's +11.1%; 49% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DFUS and DGRW

Net assets: $20.9bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF, and $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund.

At a glance
+13.8%
DFUS total return, 1 year
+11.1%
DGRW total return, 1 year
0.09%
DFUS expense ratio
0.28%
DGRW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DFUS costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points.

DFUS vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDFUSDGRW
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+11.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.28%
Net assets, DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 and DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026$20.9bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common49%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.6%36.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 278 weekly returns
DFUS DGRW
Return
Total return edge DFUS (slight) +87.6% +81.0%
Annualized edge DFUS (slight) +12.5% +11.7%
Price return edge DFUS +76.2% +65.4%
Risk
Volatility edge DGRW 16.2% 13.4%
Max drawdown edge DGRW −24.2% −16.8%
Downside capture 99.4% 92.1%
Beta 1.00 0.89
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DGRW (slight) 0.58 0.62
Sortino edge DGRW (slight) 0.87 0.93
Treynor 0.094 0.128
Calmar edge DGRW 0.52 0.70
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.33 0.19
Information ratio 1.04 −0.29
Tracking error 0.8% 4.0%

Each against its own benchmark: DFUS against IWV, Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026; DGRW against VOO, May 31, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

DFUS returned slightly more: +87.6% to +81.0%. DGRW swung less: 13.4% to 16.2%. DGRW fell less at its worst: −16.8% to −24.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DFUS vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureDFUSDGRWEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+87.6%+81.0%DFUS (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.5%+11.7%DFUS (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+76.2%+65.4%DFUSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.2%13.4%DGRWSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.8%9.0%DGRWLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.2%−16.8%DGRWDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture101.4%85.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.4%92.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.89Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.94Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.62DGRW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.93DGRW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0940.128Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.520.70DGRWAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+0.2% a yearDGRW not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.330.19Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range+0.1% to +1.5%−1.7% to +2.1%DGRW includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio1.04−0.29Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.8%4.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 278 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

49%

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and DGRW hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

49% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DFUS DGRW
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.75% 7.94%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.99% 5.74%
APPLE INC. 6.45% 3.86%
BROADCOM INC. 2.63% 2.34%
ALPHABET INC. 2.48% 2.31%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00% 2.31%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.77% 2.97%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.33% 1.53%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0.94% 1.59%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.90% 2.34%
VISA INC. 0.88% 1.41%
WALMART INC. 0.71% 0.93%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DFUS
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.83%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.38%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.37%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.35%
TESLA, INC. 1.27%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 1.12%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.62%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 0.44%
Only in DGRW
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year +13.8% +11.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +0.5 pts vs IWV −2.6 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.28%
Already in the S&P 500 89.4% 96.7%
Holdings 2236 197
Net assets, DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 and DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 $20.9bn $16.6bn

DFUS and DGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-60281424BF

DFUS and DGRW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. DFUS follows No index, actively managed and DGRW follows WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 49% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DFUS returned +13.8% and DGRW +11.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DFUS

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

DFUS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,236 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.

DGRW

DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or DGRW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +13.8% and DGRW +11.1%.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or DGRW?
DFUS is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and DGRW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 89% of DFUS and 97% of DGRW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFUS against DGRW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfus-vs-dgrw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.