Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to SCHP's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and SCHP

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−0.8%
SCHP total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.03%
SCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHP costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.2 points.

COWZ vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZSCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexUS TIPS
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.03%
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026$19.5bn$16.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ SCHP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in SCHP
United States Treasury 4.07%
United States Treasury 4.01%
United States Treasury 4.00%
United States Treasury 3.77%
United States Treasury 3.60%
United States Treasury 3.40%
United States Treasury 3.38%
United States Treasury 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Pacer Schwab
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of US TIPS
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.03%
Holdings 100 48
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 $19.5bn $16.5bn

COWZ and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

SCHP

SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or SCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and SCHP −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or SCHP?
SCHP is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-schp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.