Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to IWM's +14.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and IWM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWM costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points; IWM is 3.9 times larger.
| Measure | COWZ | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +14.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Russell 2000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.19% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.5bn | $75.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 3.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IWM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IWM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and IWM +14.1%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or IWM?
- IWM is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iwm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against IWM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iwm
[COWZ against IWM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iwm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.